Talk:Macne Series/@comment-53539-20180920174241/@comment-53539-20180920193523

^Nope, I'm unsure how to and if bother.

I was going to explain a minor habit that used to take place among MMD and UTAU users, which is content sharing and how it worked against things. Vocaloid took a hit sometimes in regards to VSQ and VSQX exchanging. Could not write it out though.

Its still going on but a lot of it took a hit because MMD users in particularly began sharing paid for content.

Basically what would happen is either freely shared something or did an "exchange" wherein they swapped say Nana's voicebank to get Papa's. This was back in 2010 when everyone got the whole "Open license" thing incorrect in places like VO forums. You know, thinking "Open license" meant that no purchase of the original software was ness. instead of what it actually meant. This sort of behaviour wasn't shunned at all. Once you had both Nana and Papa you could then use them to get say Coco White and Black for example. The main issue was, there wasn't too many doing the exchanging and sharing of files compared to general pirating and the section of the article just kept feeling weak.

It sort of felt like I was picking upon a niche of a niche. I mean there are niche issues on CC page, but this one feels too small of an issue despite how free and open its all been in the past and how it still goes on. We had during V3 that whole thing going down with the MMD content makers putting their foot down on overseas over sharing files without permission, editing and re-uploading and all that. So that was all part of it.

Either way, I can't get the section to feel strong so I don't know what to do. I do want to transfer the issue to the CC page about the open license mistake, but the section attached to it is just... Pathetic. I mean we're talking about something even vets were misquoting at the time.