User blog comment:Pihou/How to describe Wiki/Community Attitude?/@comment-53539-20140615104317/@comment-3076833-20140615171405

^ I do ponder how you handle "critiques" from anyone if you think any sort of critique should be taken as insult (although it could be i'm reading it wrong, as funny as it is). The point of critiques is to provide feedback on a work (art in this case) with the motivation to help the person improve in that field. The only real reason it tends to have negative connotation with some people is that, if it's a well thought out and written critique then there's going to be points in which the crtiquer points out all the negative stuff, which people translate as "You suck at X" instead of "You should improve on X". Of course the "nasty" critiquer (which i'm sure isn't a word but I can't think of anything else to use) who will only point out negatives and / or portray it in a very rude and mocking way, and the way it sounds I doubt that Angel was trying to be that.

TL;DR : There's a difference between critiques and mocking others works.