Talk:Status/@comment-5440805-20130327035954/@comment-5532114-20130328203103

>Popularity doesn't mean she sold well

And I claimed that where?

''>and she wasn't that popular as you think. :-/ ''

It's not what I think. It's just what..is.

>I don't know why you often question our comments on her

But I'm only questioning your comments and I don't even remember talking about her for a good while...?

''>Please explain why you doubt SeeU is showing her mark of a failure? :-/ ''

Erm. I already explained why she definitely isn't one in the previous post.

How about you explain what aside of that one comment by SBS makes her a failure?

They didn't even call her a "failure" to begin with. They just said she has sold "worse than expected".

You are basing your whole argument on a vague statement that may not even mean what you think it means, who is to say they didn't expect her to sold 100,000 copies and she only has sold 75,000?

Unrealistic and stupid, but for all we know that could be the case, because you have no actual numbers to talk about here. You are just interpreting one sentence said by the way by some person from the company.

"Mark of a failure". Heh, that's a funny one. For me, that would be if no one used her, no one made originals for her, no one talked about her etc.

Meanwhile there is a whole community centered around her, maybe not as big as it communities you are used too, but it is and it's doing well.

If SeeU is a failure then so are 80% of Vocaloids, and of a much much worse kind.

Solding well isn't everything and solding worse that expected doesn't mean she isn't profitable.

New Tomb Raider has sold 3 million copies in its first week and apparently that's "worse than expected". Does that make it a failure? Lolno.