User blog comment:Angel Emfrbl/Most-least favourite.../@comment-25577599-20150608221353/@comment-53539-20150609175953

I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY I LIKE NANA EITHER!!!!

I think the only thing with SeeU is, as I saidwith her boxart was, I feel they had a nice avatar but they didn't utilise it on the box. If avatar was the thing that sold a vocaloid to me, she'd be up the top end. But I'm going to talk about avatars next month I think, or later this month.

I will note boxart, vocal-vocaloid and design can be ranked by 3 different things so a fan who likes something about a vocaloid can dislike it in another way. So even though I dislike the boxart, the voice, I can say I rather like the avatar for SeeU, you'll be pleased to hear which is why I just felt with the box they didn't utilize her well enough.

I will admit, design is a hit or miss since I tend not to care so much for it... But I understand how it sways some and how it works for the marketing aspect of a vocaloid. So what not going to sell a vocaloid to me will sell a vocaloid to others. Plus because its used in PMV's, when, for instance, you see Big Al you know its a Big Al song without looking at the title...

Overall though, back to SeeU a mo... I'm just fed up with repeating things about SeeU... I'm starting to look forward to Uni and that requires I put SeeU aside to forget the problems that came with her so I can enter Uni's era unbias, otherwise SeeU's rotten luck might spoil Uni. Because there is only 1 Korean vocaloid, we have no other vocal to compare her with and nothing to take focus off of the bad points.

I am also kinda disappointed about how SBS promoted English without a English vocal, submitted to making one.... And then shelved it. Being a big support of English vocaloid, and how popular SeeU is overseas compared to asia, I think that was a loss. :-/