Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-35301431-20131026210714

This is about the Gallery template and the Gallery by wiki coding.

Both of these features can handle the same type of parameters. The difference being that 'Gallery template' is able to make things a bit more compact; the downside would be a smaller display of the image due to compression and also having to remember to put the lines before continuing adding more image. Also without font adjustment things are just plain small.

The issue I have with the Gallery template is that after repeatedly telling people not to put the parameters below the image, they continue to do it and that results in the template breaking. At least with the raw coding contributors are forced to comply because that is the only way the coding works.

The Wiki coded version displays images larger by default because it attempts to adjust to the actual image size. The downside to the coding is making sure that even the most oddly cropped images follow a consistent pattern, so while the box is the same size by height, there is a differences in the width.

Continue to use the Gallery template on Producer, Song, and Album pages? Yes, keep template usage. No, switch to wiki coding.  