User talk:84.127.90.15

Reply to your commen on Damesukekun's page
Sorry I can't reply directly, haha, I've got the 'no comments in 30 days' message. Anyway, I'll try to address your problems.

1. Damesukekun is not giving out constructive critism:

I hope that the flaws he points out are helpful to translaters. :D That's actually the general format for critiques, though of course it's better when you talk to them directly. However,the blog is for is a useful guide for editors as to which translations are the most accurate from an objective viewpoint. Unfortunately critiques would be time consuming, but the blog does fufill a useful purpose despite it. It would be great if we had more people fluent in Japanese to contribute, too. Damesukekun has tried his best to make the blog neutral in tone, we're not actively trying to discorouge anyone from learning or improving their Japanese, quite the opposite, in fact. c; It is purely for practicality, a useful reference.

2. We are listening mostly to the opinion of someone who speaks Japanese (did I interpret your words correctly? Sorry if this wasn't a problem of yours):

Those who grew up in a country and still actively use their language are, on average, proficient at it. The term 'weeaboo' is defined by irrational glorificaiton of Japan and the Japanese, I hope this reason explains the logic behind it and proves to you that we are not being irrational, or at least don't intend to be.

3. You're offended at Damesukekun saying their are flaws in your's or someone else's translation:

For this I am very sorry. orz Please don't feel demotivated, languages are all complex and mulitfaceted. Keep an eye out for other's opinions, but think or them not as attacks but as pointers or suggestions that may even help you or teach you something new. Even if you don't agree with Damesukekun's decisions (in which case do feel free to discuss the specifics of the translation with him and explain the word use and why it is correct/point out the mistakes you believe he made; we all make them), just be aware that we weren't trying to villify any translaters mentioned. n_n