Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25618373-20150418202208/@comment-32500188-20150420120721

It comes down to the fact that some of the works (like the one linked by Embrace) straight up mention that they used Pocaloid in the video descriptions. I'm inclined to side with the fact that if said usage is still in existence no matter how old it is, then there shouldn't be any links to the user here. It's been done for every other user that has been found to openly use it, and I don't see any point in blurring lines with the situation. It'd be a different story if the content had been removed, but it's not.