Board Thread:Off-Topic Discussion/@comment-6433273-20150516191501/@comment-30602727-20150605212936

Nick, if they're like that, there's a 80% chance they wouldn't listen tbh. :/

Okay, the editors, like all people, are entitled to their own opinion. Of course, opinions don't belong on the articles themselves, so we have every right to express it in threads, blogs and in the comments should we so please.

I don't want to know what they said about the frequent editors if it's not nice. Okay, some of us have been here for years or less... but when we stay here long enough, we develop experience in how to contribute. Yeah, sure.... maybe some of us haven't said the nicest things or we might come off as elitist, but the wiki is one of the places where newbie fans come across to learn more or interact. And instructing/correcting is one of our "jobs" (or it doesn't have to be).

And as noted, the admins do not and can not play favorites. Otherwise, that would be abuse of their power here. And like every other editor, if some anon or new account started editing a page with no source or summary when they finish editing, they will be suspicious. And if that anon/newb keeps trying to edit without summary or source, the admin will think its spam and may resort to blocking. It's a normal reaction from us. They're not playing favorites and they're not blocking just because it's an anon. If you don't explain what you're doing, how are we supposed to know it's legit?