Talk:AVANNA/@comment-32500188-20130924032732/@comment-32500188-20130925125712

Ah... sorry to hear that. I mean, I understand he was put in a rocky predicament over the whole thing, but if anything I would've thought the article itself to have been pulled as a result, not the whole site. :-( I know it was exciting for a lot of people to finally find out the name of Avanna's official voice provider, but if info is given out in confidentiallity like this was, then it's probably best to hold off on publicizing it if not everyone seems to be on board with it being out for all to see. (Seemingly, it's the voice provider in this case if there hasn't been a response back from her yet.) Like it's been said, it does draw a lot of doubt without visible proof to back it up.

I honestly do trust that the info is correct, seeing as I have read through some of Scott's articles in the past that were fairly informative and accurate, but for the wikia's sake, there needs to be something to cite so doubts can be cast aside for people that can only trust what they can see for themselves. Hopefully someone does get a viable response back to confirm it... or perhaps there's that chance Zero-G might plan on announcing it publicly themselves in the future. Either way, I'm just hoping this situation doesn't get any more dramatic than it already is. :-P