Board Thread:Off-Topic Discussion/@comment-32988707-20180128173444/@comment-66.150.8.161-20180207210328

Hi Diz,

This is the same kind of problem that I have with your posts being brought back up all over again. You are intentionally stirring something up and you say you are keeping your posts intentionally vague in order to protect the identities of those people who are involved, but you never post the full context which can rile people up or - whether it's a tweet or a drawing made by their friend (which you are basically saying spawned your reasons for posting in the first place). But now you are jumping right back into calling out a anime art "sexual depictions of children". If your intent was so innocent, how can you say that shotacon - "of which you believe the fandom is okay with"  is the same as being a pedophile?

Also, you just said this>> After seeing the dev's friend's deviantart, you were shaken, and checked their twitter for keywords, and the tweet was one of the first things that came up.

Ok, so you are admitting that you did search for keywords and you are saying that you are actively digging up dirt on them based on something their friends drew? Isn't this a bit reaching that you are punishing someone directly related to the project because you take offense at something you dislike about their friend's artworks?

Also, I don't buy this explanation that it's sexual content. I went on their friend's deviantart and I don't see anything that can be construed as sexual. Nothing was NSFW, there were no R-18 content, and they seem no different from other anime artists on deviantart that draw in the kawaii style but laced with a little bit of ecchi and stopped right there. This is not even shotacon since they only seem to draw crossdressing characters, who are clothed and covered up. You didn't read or take to heart anything that we at VO said. Which is to not stir up or rile up any more drama related to controversial topics.

You first posted that tweet that stirred a shitstorm, and the situation is cleared up now, but now you are now trying to move onto something new which is to accuse a friend of purin's for drawing sexual things >>>  I won't be falling for it a second time.

We already discussed this at the VO thread - that the explanation to the tweet could have just been the fact that they were weebs into anime and made an off color joke. Now,  you are saying that you posted after seeing someone's anime drawings. Then, you go on to say that cillia and them are into sexualizing kids because they posted or liked artwork that looks like shotacon to you, why can't you just accept it like the rest of us. I think that Angel explained the borderline genre very precisely. If you don't like that kind of art style that's fine, but going as far as to start some new shit over artwork  is reaching.

So their friends'  artwork is a controversial subject to you,  I still don't see how this is directly related to a vocaloid project? If you are a vocaloid forum mod, please start act like one instead of flying on a tangent and arguing that it's because of their friend's art that made you act the way you did.

VO used to be a fun place but now it's turned into toxic opinions and witch hunting. I don't fear getting banned for my opinions, but I no longer want to post there after hearing your direct responses on our greivances. Vocalofan isn't going to DM you to beg you for an apology, it's something you have to offer to them yourself. They are suffering and believe you set them up to take the fall, and don't understand why you would do something like shadowbanning to hurt them. If you don't understand this, you are just cementing the fact that VO is and will always be toxic because your first reaction is to have a victim DM you asking for an apology instead of the other way around.