User blog comment:OtterJiang/Okay, So, SeeU./@comment-5665682-20150107011803/@comment-25577599-20150107021602

I think what really gets me is that these facts that I post about statistics and numbers about SeeU and her pageviews, or her concerts, or anything, usually get shut down, even if they're true. Let me quote myself, here:

"...whenever I mention that "hey, SeeU has a bunch of songs over 100k!" It's like "that doesn't matter, she's still one of the most disliked VOCALOIDs in the business. Those views on the YouTube videos don't actually count, and therefore she is not popular". I made a comment about how she's got the most fanart of any V3, and the response I get it "she doesn't get as much uploads now, so she's not as popular and so the fact that she has the most fanart (on dA), doesn't matter."

I mention how she's had more concerts than any other V3, and I get "they're just promotional, they don't really count. They don't mean anything, even if the place where the event's held gets sold out or filled up, she's still unpopular and it's just marketing so it means nothing."

She's got impressive numbers, statistical facts going for her here. But they get shut down like they're not facts. Is it because I say them by adding in the "sure she had a bad run, but she has also..."? Is that the issue?

over 10,000 works on deviantART, when inputting "SeeU vocaloid". 2,000 more works than "IA vocaloid". How can you look at that and tell me she's not popular? YouTube videos with over 500,000 views, and multiples, at that? How can you look at that and tell me that's not popular? Over five concerts, those performed solo filled with fans in the entire stadium, or convention, and they were very well received concerts? How can you look at that and tell me that's not popular? Or, at the very least, a sign of success?