Talk:Controversy Concerns/@comment-2020924-20151113111753/@comment-53539-20151113115424

The first shows the adaption of the design into other things, even parodying the design.

The second one is to explain how designs are often influenced or influence future products. Its needed to basically explain "yes it can happen and yes it does". Other then dumbing things down, there is no fault in it remaining and its existence backs up what the rest of it is saying.

The section was written with a lot of pressure on it bare in mind. People are particularly touchy on the subject of "copycat" designs for some reason in this fandom (don't get me started on this). Its broken down as far as a section can go and expanded on to get readers to understand things without them having kittens out of rage.

Having been the beating post over "Miku Formula" (the drama was unneeded and over reacting, and based on misunderstandings... but we did get this entire page out of it so some good came out of it). Between trying to make the okay for the over reactors and trying to keep it educational and explanatory with causing them to rage. :-/