Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-53539-20130506185212/@comment-35301431-20130717142911

Kimi2.0 wrote: How about WHY IS THIS ARTICLE EVEN HERE IN THE FIRST PLACE?

...it goes to listing a bunch of design elements that were supposedly inspired from Miku. It doesn't take Sherlock to deduce that it seems like the article at first glance is implying all those Vocaloids copied Miku. The purpose was an attempt to dispel that female characters holding similar elements, post or pre Miku, are not influenced or copied. On Tropes wiki I had to remove false information about the character Runo (three times), because people believed she was some kind of direct homage to Vocaloid, when truthfully she predates Crypton's Vocaloid2s by months.

Kimi2.0 wrote: I feel the same about strenght/weaknesses sections for example. Subjective stuff like this is a forum material and have no place on a wikia. We have topics about this, just expand on what to do with the section. We can't just have no information on a voice bank when there are reviews and consistent comments on a quirk that a voice bank has.

So the stress of VO's existence is the Miku Formula section? Dang, that's rough.