Talk:SeeU/@comment-28951715-20180926172945/@comment-28951715-20180928131351

@Angel Sure, fair enough. I'll concede that if SeeU doesn't see an update, and if she doesn't get an import tool from V3 into V6 or  V7 sure, she could be "dead" by those standards.

But people who bought V3-V5 Editor who use SeeU now I'm positive would have no issue continuing to use those engines if it means they can continue to use that vocal. It's not that hard to get around an "obsolete" engine if you just never get rid of it, lol.

But in any case, I suppose what I'll argue is we shouldn't be calling SeeU dead, now. It's disingenuous and false, especially considering we only just got V5. You said it yourself, worst case scenario SeeU has four years left before she becomes "actually dead".

So suffice to say you don't have to keep telling people she's dead NOW, not when she's still actively being used and is capable of use in V4/V5.

It's harmful and almost mean to just dismiss SeeU now when she's seeing success and active usage today just because, again, you don't see her usage and don't actively pursue it, and because she didn't get an update.

I'll start to be concerned if ST Media doesn't release UNI's appends and her English voicebank. There were rumors of a potential third Korean voicebank, but we won't know until UNI's updates come out.

Considering how long it takes Dr. Yun and co. to get much of anything done (focused on putting out a quality product, bless them), on top of the sudden release of V5, it would make sense that we've got a bit of a wait.

But if nothing comes of it and we're stuck with just SeeUNI, then fine. Until that happens, if it even does, I'd like it if we'd stop with the bleakness and the sensational claims that SeeU's dead as of today, and just wait and see.

As was said before, you never know what could happen with Vocaloids.