Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-1155842-20140616202404/@comment-32500188-20150504014610

Just as long as it's nothing like the second coming of Kimberly AJ. (All those undos and redos of format-breaking spaces and random punctuation.... over... and over... and over... all whilst disregarding any and ALL requests to stop doing so, from other users and admins alike. It gives me the chills just thinking back on how anger-inducing all of that was for those that tried to reason with her but ended up feeling like they were better of talking to a brick wall.) (A;)

It was THAT which was the absolute main point of the thread in general: random flip-flop edits that do nothing to improve anything = "badge farming". So adding a random letter, then going back and editing out the letter you just added... then going back again and putting it again. Stuff like that is what was meant to be targeted in this whole thread. Thankfully it hasn't been an issue with that since the perma-ban, but it was definitely something that needed to be noted in case of future instances of it happening.

TLDR: So as long as you don't do like that forementioned user in the OP was doing, if edits are constructive and have a definite point to fixing something within any given article, no matter what the size, they're perfectly welcome. Either way, I do agree that it's always a great idea to preview edits before submitting to try and avoid having to go back for tiny missed revisions. (Even though, if you're like me, I tend to still gloss over and keep going back to fix stuff even after doing such...) XP