Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-35301431-20130822203251/@comment-53539-20130825150954

I just don't see why we're wasting our time, no one complained about it until Kim brought it up and were happy enough with the use. People get the meaning and it works for the purpose.

This remainds me of a club I used to go to that spent 3 hours arguing over the accounts because one penny was missing from the account until finally the chairman said "forget it its not worth discussing". If its something major I agree to change things without kicking up a fuss, but 1 little word which isn't what you would call urgent matters.

As things goes, Mascot is only the perferred word we use anyway, we change words where need it. This is what Kim has failed to acknowledge and I've said it before and this is the last time I say it. the use of "mascot" is being used because it "fits" where its being used. There are indeed other words we can use but they DON'T tend to suit the situation.

Welcome to the English language where words can be SWAPPED for the most suitable term... Like small, dwarf, little, minute, diminutive, puny, etc...

I'm not even going to vote in a poll if one is run but as far as I'm concern "why should we be forced to use one word over any others when we have more freedom right now". This is why I keep saying "why fix whats not broken"... And why I've created so much fuss so far over this and why arguing over this is a waste of time.