Talk:Controversy Concerns/POCALOID and illegal modifications/@comment-53539-20190401190841/@comment-91.13.231.220-20190908062936

The way it is right now, the article does seem very actively biased against UTAU as a whole. I know this is just a fan wiki, but on the real Wikipedia, writing a rant about how UTAU is clearly inferior, and trying to convince people of something sounds like it would be ban-worthy. I assume that's why the person removed the section.

My opinion is that the article should try being more factual and objective. The only thing that is supposed to go under "VOCALOID -> UTAU" is a detailed explanation of the legal restrictions, and maybe a history of past occurances.

Not an explanation why the conversion clearly sounds horrible and why would anyone do this its just shit and if you try it youre stupid and criminal. Aside from the "criminal" part, that is just an opinion. And Wiki articles are not opinions.