User blog comment:Angel Emfrbl/Sad Face :-(/@comment-5051846-20130123212303

On the topic of relating problems across the internet, it's really hard to do and to get help because people judge the seriousness of the case/whether it is real, etc, mostly by knowing you and your personality then relating it to how you were and how you are now, or seeing your face and knowing that something is wrong. It takes a great deal of effort to lie in real life, but on the internet a heartfelt plea through typing is on the same level as any fiction, so it's really hard to prove yourself. Due to highly populized hoaxes, and how we are nowadays brought up not to believe people we can't see over the net, sceptisim is everywhere. Your capacity for sympathy also dramatically drops when you can't see someone. I agree, you'll be treated best in real life.

As for debating and arguements, perhaps if you want tremendously to say something and get a point across, you might just want to take the time out and make a plan? I know it sounds patronising, but I am a student taking quite a few essay-writing subjects and currently getting your arguement across clearly is something I am working on myself, and I see no stoppage preventing it from being be applied to real life if you need it. n_n If you have lots of different ideas, (this happens to me a lot, like many people my style of thinking is not linear) why not keep them seperate in spoilers or bullet points? It helps me get a better understanding of my own conclusions too - and causes me to question my first assumptions at times. This muddle I see so often on the internet I think a bit of planning might do help make debates more comprehendable, at least.