Talk:Xingchen/@comment-53539-20190331102825/@comment-53539-20190401075912

I was in a hurry and this didn't go where I wanted it to, this should have been attached to the other comment.

Also, again, your not takin into account UTAU is a singing software and Voiceroid, talking. So their not the same type of synth here. If she was to move to VOCALOID, the UTAU vocal will have to go in favour of the Vocaloid. Or if it went to CeVIO, only the singing vocal would be able to go, the talking would remain with Voiceroid, unless they wanted both transferred to CeVIO.

It doesn't mean that because the provider supplied their SINGING vocal to one software, they can't then supply their TALKING to another. What they can't do is supply BOTH the same thing to two different synths, because some like Sony and Yamaha require you only supply *them* with the goods. In short, for Synth V to have the CHINESE SINGING voicebank, the CHINIESE SINGING voicebank would have to legally come off of Vocaloid. If not, Yamaha would have grounds to create a fuss over it.

There is no issue with a SINGING ENGLISH vocal on Synth V, because that currently doesn't exist anywhere as far as we know. It is literally the SINGING CHINESE vocal thats the one that will cause red flags.

Your not paying attention to EXACTLY what I'm saying here Manaboy, read carefully.

Long story short, the EXACT same voicebank cannot appear on a Proprietary software and Vocaloid, CeVIO, Voiceroid, etc demand that you only license your vocal for use with their software. Once you therefore make a vocal for that software, you can't make the same thing for another.