Board Thread:Off-Topic Discussion/@comment-6433273-20150620015912/@comment-53539-20150705121116

EmbraceEvil wrote: 92.0.136.234 wrote: EmbraceEvil wrote: 92.0.136.234 wrote: I think you're all over reacting and should wait a bit longer to see what the story behind that design is before you jump to conclusions.

PowerFX have used placeholder art before. Have you read Syo's tweets? This is not the case PFX have a rep for bumbling, we don't know the full story and perhaps not even Syo does. we do know the whole story. read the tweets And there are two sides to every story, and things can happen to change whats final. I'm not saying I'm right, I'm just saying let events unfold and the story tell itself. As I said, PFX have a rep for bumbling, but they have a rep for also trying to fix problems they created in regards to artwork.

While it sucks for Syo, all of this is out of our hands and is between Syo and PFX. If Syo really is disgusted, he would quit altogether, except, he is already doing this without the events at hand occuring, there is the option to go to Zero-G like he wanted but he seems unable to do that. We have *something* missing here and thats the problem. We don't know what is missing, but no amount of guessing by Syo or fans will resolve that until we get more news. If Syo completely objects and has indeed the final say on ruby, he shouldn't care about this and just pull her from PowerFX's hands, so if there is something preventing Syo doing this then something has already occurred and we don't know the full sotry.

No ifs...

No buts...

We have 1 element of the story missing thats not being mentioned anywhere and its useless dramaing over it until we've had more news.