Talk:Kagamine Rin & Len/@comment-103.57.39.118-20191021094354/@comment-53539-20191022005411

There is also the Rule 34 issue, which wouldn't be a problem if the Kagamines weren't 1 years old and therefore children. MOST of the Vocaloid paedophile artwork is to do with the Kagamines both due to their popularity and the fact there is a male and female character. Meaning that if your attracted to either male or female characters who are underage, the Kagamine have one gender or the other of what your attracted to, plus because they are opposite genders you can even make them both the subject of the problem.

Since most of the fans are about the same age when they first get into Vocaloid, they are attracted to them and all that. A 14 year old has no problems with artwork of another 14 year old characters being naked or doing sexual acts, from experience of talking to people on-line who mention things like this. But an adult who is in their 40s is "creepy". The fact that so many fans can no issues with this makes it worst.

Because its artwork of fake characters, not real people, there is often on sites like DA a play wherein the artists try and justified why they did artwork of a 1 year old like this by "rules of DA..." saying its JUST a drawing and therefore fine. Even though DAs rules prohibit even characters who are fictional being depicted.

So the Kagamine fanbase has some of the worst acts among the Vocaloid franchise it can commit. The depiction of paedophilia imagery.

Yes, Luo Tiyani, Oliver, etc exist, but those characters just don't receive the same amount of artwork overall.In the last year I think I've reported 2 images ofLuo Tiyani and 1 of Oliver, but almost every week I end up reporting 2-3 images related to the Kagamines. Just about every time you click on the image to report it, there can be up to half a dozen praises for the artwork still, so there definitely are people out there who are chilled with this and this is worrysome.