Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-35301431-20130317021657/@comment-5532114-20130605212450

@ LaZMMiSY This is slightly better, only because in most cases producers use this way of credit anyway, so there won't be that many irregulations.... I only don't agree on the additional instruments. They are either credited after the illustrators/video makers or before them. But mostly after.

''>My reasoning for this is it looks messy when sometimes the illustrator is credited first in one song, and then last in another. ''

This only matters assuming someone would care enough to notice.

>Consistency also makes it easier for newer editors.

No, newer editors would usually just do whatever they want anyway unless someone tells them not to.

>I think consistency is important especially in this Wikia, everything is unoraganized.

Lol. Not everything must be consistent in order to be organized.

''>It just seems silly to want it in a specific order because a producer that way, especially if it's a random order. ''

Yeah, how silly for producers to decide how to credit people for their own work.

Well, what if the main 'producer' of the song is the lyricist/ illustrator? I mean if the original idea behind the song came from them, it's uploaded on their account and all, and the people who made the music are only 'hired' / collaborated / helped that person to bring their idea to life..? what then.