Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-69.29.91.129-20141129083917/@comment-3467648-20141207202149

Yeah,, but in the most cases the obvious answer is the correct one, and the most obvious answer tells that it may exists a correlation between the cracking of the app and its eventual removal.

About your second statement you're wrong because:
 * 1) A free download software doesn't mean the publisher doesn't get any profit, as there exists other mechanism in which the publisher can make cash despite not charging any price for download its content (advertisement, sponsorship, number of visits/download, etc)
 * 2) You're defining ''fair use' incorrectly. Indeed, what are you saying is against the 4th criterion usually used for determine fair use: 4) "the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work".

Don't try justify something everybody knows is wrong. Unethical practices always produces harm, that's a fact, and that's the reason why most of the regular editors in this wikia are against them.