Talk:RUBY (VOCALOID4)/@comment-30602727-20150929222544/@comment-24684900-20151001204541

It's not giving in if you agree with the complaints. Ruby's page was bulky, had a lot of unnecessary information, and had information that was worded weirdly. I would understand not paying attention to those complaints if all of that information was essential, but it wasn't.

Thankfully we can have a word list without making the page horrendously long, but a lot of that information needed to be deleted as it was redundant or put elsewhere as it was irrelevant to this article. Even now, it's more disjointed than I'd like it to be, and it probably needs more information to fill in the gaps.

The Ruby page was horrendously organized. Just because outside comments were mentioned as examples doesn't mean we gave in to them. At the very least, I know I started editing this page without knowing about those comments, and when I saw them I agreed. The Ruby page was too long.