Talk:RUBY (VOCALOID4)/@comment-30602727-20150929222544/@comment-24684900-20151003130347

@Angel

I don't think that it being too long is an objective thing. More like the article was too long for the information that was housed. Like every new information had its own paragraph (which is understandable when first adding the information), and of course there was redundant and unnecessary info that people did not really cared for, like the potential release dates that never happened. I think the worse problem about it is that it really didn't read like an article, which probably exaggerated the length and made it feel unreasonably long.

I guess I can understand your sentiment about discussing about the length before nuking the page, but I still stand by the fact that the length was just a side effect of the bigger problem with these more recent edits.