Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-35301431-20130822203251/@comment-3467648-20130827083335

No, I didn't miss it. In fact what I read it was you causing a fuss . Basically it's you being hardheaded as  you also are interpreting the word at your own.

Personally I prefer the term mascot or avatar than character because I emphasise difference between the voicebank fromthe image that represents or promotes it (although I recognize in some particular cases the term may be wrong)

I think its a good way state a break in that sense and stablish the difference between both. Many people in this immature fandom hates a Vocaloid (voice+image) just because "they did something bad to my favorite Vocaloid/OTP in a that song!"

Just check the bias behind the Kagamines! One of the lowest quality voices from the V2 era and still manages to rise the fury and passion of the fandom >.> (Miku hated for Story of Evil anyone?)

From my experience, I think the term character just contributes to perpetuate that kind of confusion. I've seen this repeatedly in the Evillious series where differents characters borrows the voice and appearence of the same Vocaloid Avatar.

Now, about the Meiko and Kaito, that appears in their respective articles. The situation and difference between both and CV series  was emphasized by WAT when he talked about KAITO's V3 redesigns