User blog comment:Angel Emfrbl/My apologises/@comment-3076833-20141130155554/@comment-35301431-20141130233746

''>>you auto assumed that she was being purposeful about what she said? <<''

Not all. Do believe I am looking at this from various angles (as I have mentioned before I take things at face value but I also observe). From my understanding that while she is frustrated with the fandoms reaction to things like ALYS and Jewel being swept in the VOCALOID hype, she does have history and trust issues with Planty. It is that lingering thought that resulted in mere opinion being hand-in-hand with the reaction. Meaning, the history was fuel so that was the purposeful part. There is no mistaking that it was meant to be negative even though it wasn't meant as an attack. <-- I hope that made sense.

Example. The fandom currently can't seem to separate SeeU as a VOCALOID from her voice providers actions (at least those who are not aware of who the VP is). People are going to be negative speaking without realizing it unless they are told.

On a related note, could you point out in my comment on the first blog entry that you felt my reply was un-called for? Maybe I can further explain my own context if I get a jump-off point.