Board Thread:Off-Topic Discussion/@comment-6433273-20150709181231/@comment-25618373-20150825035753

Johatsun Kikuro wrote: EmbraceEvil wrote: Johatsun Kikuro wrote: @XSY mod conversation  -  If I recall reading on this site correctly, the issue raised with Cross-Synthesis between the Voicebanks of two completely different Vocaloids is that their Terms Of Use ( & EULA, etc.) may not be the same. Obviously it would be more likely that the Terms Of Use, etc. would vary between two Vocaloids from two different companies. However, if two Vocaloids are from the same company, might their Terms Of Use, etc. be the same?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I have been given the impression that if two Vocaloids have the same Terms Of Use, EULA, etc. and are from the same company, then a Cross-Synthesis between them wouldn't be illegal. still illegal I appologize for having been misinformed, having misinterpreted the information I was originally given, or some combination thereof then. XP

Then where does the legailty issue lie exactly? basically If A wasn't meant to be cross synthesized with B, or vice versa, it's illegal.